The issue of the hijab in Algeria has returned to the forefront of public debate in recent days, following a series of events and statements that have brought it back into the discussion in the context of political and intellectual debates related to the role of women in society and political parties.
In this context, the appearance of the Algerian Minister of Solidarity, Souria Mouloudji, without a head covering sparked widespread reaction on social media platforms, with comments divided between those who considered the matter normal and within the framework of personal freedom, and those who focused on the change in the minister’s appearance compared to previous official occasions.
This controversy arose after the minister's participation in a ceremony honoring senior officials who had retired, an administrative and protocol-driven event that usually receives limited media attention. However, photos published on official ministry pages transformed the event into a subject of widespread discussion, with much of the reaction focusing more on the overall appearance than the substance of the occasion itself.
Minister Mouloudji (born 1977) is an academic and researcher with a doctorate in translation and anthropology. She worked for years in scientific research and university teaching before entering government service. She assumed the Ministry of Culture and Arts in February 2022, before later moving to the Ministry of Solidarity as part of successive government reshuffles.
Despite the volume of interaction that accompanied her photos, the general trend of comments was calm or neutral, as many considered the dress of officials to be a personal matter, and that performance evaluation should be linked to work and public policies, not to outward appearance.
This debate was not isolated, but rather coincided with the resurgence of other discussions related to the hijab and its presence in Algerian society, particularly the reaction to statements made by the linguistics professor Khawla Taleb Ibrahimi, granddaughter of Sheikh Bachir Ibrahimi, one of the most prominent figures of the historic Association of Algerian Muslim Scholars. In an interview broadcast on the Al-Khabar channel, Ibrahimi stated that the hijab is a broader concept than simply a head covering, and that it can be linked to a person's behavior and inner values. This statement sparked a wave of comments, especially since it came from an academic from a family of significant religious and historical standing.
Not far from that, the issue of the hijab emerged in the legislative election campaign, after the National Construction Movement, a party with an Islamic orientation, nominated unveiled women on its electoral lists, and this is not the first time that this option has been adopted.
In this context, academic Suleiman Nasser wrote a post questioning the background of this trend, and whether it reflects organizational flexibility, a shift in intellectual reference, or simply an attempt to expand the electoral base and attract new segments of voters.
Reactions to this proposal have varied. Some argue that this is not a new phenomenon in the experiences of Islamist parties worldwide, citing political examples in Tunisia and Turkey where unveiled women have participated in Islamist political parties without necessarily signifying a fundamental shift in those parties' ideological foundations. Others maintain that this phenomenon reflects what they describe as an identity crisis facing some political groups attempting to reconcile their ideological principles with the demands of electoral competition.
In a striking paradox, the appearance of women without their pictures on some electoral lists of the Socialist Forces Front party, a party with a secular orientation, also raised questions about the reasons for choosing candidates who are unable to appear in an electoral competition.
In this context, journalist Mohamed Mouloud wrote a comment about the usefulness of running for office in the absence of a picture of the candidate, at a time when elections are based primarily on introducing the candidate and building a relationship of trust between him and the voters.
In his blog post, Moloj wrote: “How can a voter recognize his representative if the latter chooses not to appear before him? And how can trust be built in a political figure without the minimum visual identification that allows the voter to distinguish and follow him during the electoral process?”
The journalist also raised other legal and political questions, inquiring about the framework that allows nominations without clear photos of the candidates, and whether this falls within the provisions of the electoral law or represents a regulatory gap requiring clarification. He also questioned why the relevant authorities have not taken action if the matter does not comply with the established rules, or what the basis for this was if it is permissible.
This phenomenon is concentrated in a specific social context, where conservative social customs in some areas play a role in determining the form of women’s presence in the public sphere, including election campaigns, which explains, in the view of some observers, the tendency of some female candidates not to show their faces in election advertisements or published lists.
Tags:
africa
